What is negative gearing? Negative gearing is a tax strategy where an investor borrows money to buy an asset, like a rental property, and the costs of owning that asset exceed the income it generates. This loss can be deducted from the investor's taxable income, reducing their overall tax bill. In Australia, this practice is common among property investors, with over 1.3 million people reporting net rental losses. While it offers significant tax benefits, negative gearing also sparks debate due to its impact on the housing market and the distribution of tax benefits, which often favor higher-income earners.
Key Takeaways:
- Negative gearing allows investors to deduct losses from taxable income, benefiting high-income earners. It impacts housing market dynamics and government revenue, sparking political and economic debates.
- Changes to negative gearing could make housing more accessible for first-home buyers but carry political risks. It also has significant implications for government revenue.
What is Negative Gearing?
Negative gearing is a popular yet controversial investment strategy in Australia. It involves borrowing money to invest in an asset that generates income, like a rental property, where the costs exceed the income. This results in a net loss, which can be deducted from the investor's taxable income.
-
Definition of Negative Gearing: Negative gearing refers to investing in an asset that generates expenses greater than the income earned from it, resulting in a net loss.
-
Prevalence in Australia: Over 1.9 million Australians earn rental income, with around 1.3 million reporting a net rental loss, showing the widespread use of negative gearing.
-
Tax Benefits: The main benefit is the ability to deduct rental losses from taxable income, reducing overall tax liability.
-
Capital Gains Tax Discount: Combining negative gearing with the capital gains tax (CGT) discount can significantly reduce an investor's tax burden. The CGT discount allows investors to pay only 50% of the capital gain on the sale of an asset owned for more than 12 months.
Impact on the Housing Market
Negative gearing has significant effects on the housing market, influencing both prices and availability. Critics argue it drives up house prices and rents, making it harder for first-home buyers.
-
Impact on Housing Market: Negative gearing and the CGT discount are believed to encourage more investors to compete with would-be homebuyers, potentially driving up house prices and rents.
-
Distribution of Tax Benefits: The majority of tax benefits from negative gearing flow to the top 10% of income earners, as higher-income individuals are more likely to have other investments that provide them with an income.
-
Historical Context: Negative gearing has been part of the Australian tax system since the 1980s, with its popularity and associated tax benefits subject to various reviews and proposed changes.
-
Henry Tax Review: In 2010, the Henry Tax Review recommended reducing the CGT discount from 50% to 40%, but this recommendation was not adopted by the government.
Political and Economic Debates
Negative gearing is a hot topic in political and economic discussions. Different parties and institutions have varying views on its benefits and drawbacks.
-
Grattan Institute Report: The Grattan Institute proposed a 25% CGT discount and removing the ability to deduct investment losses from non-investment income. This proposal was not implemented but has been revisited in recent years.
-
Labor Party's Policy: The Labor Party has proposed limiting negative gearing to new builds only, with existing negatively geared properties exempted, aiming to reduce the impact on the housing market and make housing more accessible for first-home buyers.
-
Effect on House Prices: Changes to negative gearing could lead to a modest 2% decrease in house prices due to reduced demand from property investors.
-
Impact on Rental Properties: Fewer investors would mean fewer rental properties, but existing rental properties could be bought by homebuyers, potentially reducing the number of renters.
Economic Theories and Principles
Economists argue that negative gearing and CGT concessions are primarily tax policies rather than housing policies. These concessions cost the budget billions annually but are contentious in political debates.
-
Economic Theories: Economists argue that negative gearing and CGT concessions are primarily tax policies rather than housing policies, costing the budget billions annually.
-
Political Debate: The Greens argue that restricting negative gearing could help address the housing crisis, while the Coalition believes it could worsen the situation.
-
Affluent Areas: Restricting negative gearing would primarily affect affluent areas with high concentrations of property investors, potentially leading to political resistance.
-
Long-term Benefits: The major benefit of negative gearing comes from combining it with the CGT discount, allowing investors to reduce their tax liability significantly if the property appreciates in value over time.
Real-World Examples and Scenarios
Understanding negative gearing through real-world examples helps illustrate its benefits and risks. Here’s a scenario to consider.
-
Example Scenario: An investor buys a property for $500,000 and sells it for $750,000 after five years. If costs exceed rental income, the investor can deduct the loss against taxable income. When selling, they pay tax on half of the capital gain ($100,000), resulting in a tax bill of approximately $48,000 on a net income of $270,000.
-
Tax Savings: The combination of negative gearing and the CGT discount can result in substantial tax savings. Without these concessions, the tax bill would be significantly higher, around $92,000 in this example.
-
Investment Strategy: Negative gearing only makes sense if the investor expects the property to appreciate significantly in value. Buying a brand-new property and then finding out it is worth less than the purchase price is a bad investment strategy.
-
Existing vs. New Properties: Existing properties are more likely to appreciate in value than brand-new ones, making them more attractive to investors expecting long-term appreciation.
High-Income Earners and Taxable Income Distribution
High-income earners benefit the most from negative gearing due to their ability to invest in better-quality properties and access expert advice.
-
High-Income Earners: High-income earners are more likely to accrue higher capital gains because they can afford to buy better-quality properties and pay for expert advice.
-
Taxable Income Distribution: The distribution of taxable income among those who negatively gear is skewed. While many middle-income earners use negative gearing, the majority of the tax benefits flow to the top 10% of income earners.
Myths and Misconceptions
There are several myths surrounding negative gearing, particularly regarding its impact on new housing supply and rent prices.
-
Myth: Negative Gearing Promotes New Housing Supply: The property industry argues that tax incentives for investment housing encourage more homes to be built. However, over 93% of property lending is for existing housing, and negative gearing mainly bids up prices for the limited new supply.
-
Myth: Negative Gearing Keeps Rent Prices Lower: The property industry claims that rents rise when negative gearing is restricted, but historical data does not support this. Rent increases were largely due to population growth and insufficient residential construction rather than policy changes.
Impact on First-Home Buyers and Government Revenue
Changes to negative gearing could make housing more accessible for first-home buyers and have significant implications for government revenue.
-
Impact on First-Home Buyers: Changes to negative gearing could make housing more accessible for first-home buyers by reducing the number of rental properties available, potentially lowering barriers to entry.
-
Government Revenue: The cost to the public purse from negative gearing is substantial. For example, a couple on the pension might claim back $25,000 in their early years of property investment, which is a significant saving for future governments.
Rental Market Dynamics and Tax System Principles
Negative gearing affects rental market dynamics and is rooted in the principles of Australia's tax system, which focuses on net profits rather than gross revenue.
-
Rental Market Dynamics: Restricting negative gearing might reduce the number of rental properties available, but it would not increase rents. Every time an investor sells a property, a current renter buys it, maintaining the balance between supply and demand.
-
Tax System Principles: Australia’s tax system operates on the principle that people pay tax on their personal income, less any expenses (deductions) incurred in generating that income. This principle is consistent with how business profits are taxed.
-
Deductions for Costs: Deductions for costs incurred in producing income recognize that different people have different costs in producing income, allowing individuals to manage their tax liabilities more effectively.
-
Expectation of Capital Gain: Some people are willing to make a loss on an investment property or shares in the expectation that the capital gain when they sell the asset will more than offset that loss.
Non-Tax Factors and Historical Data
Non-tax factors also drive people to negatively gear property investment, and historical data provides insights into the effects of policy changes.
-
Non-Tax Factors: Non-tax factors also drive people to negatively gear property investment. Perceptions about the advantages of negative gearing and biases towards investing in 'bricks and mortar' can influence investment decisions.
-
Historical Data: Historical data shows that rents did not necessarily rise when negative gearing was restricted in the past. Inflation-adjusted rents were stable in Melbourne and actually fell in Adelaide and Brisbane during such periods.
-
Population Growth: Population growth and insufficient residential construction rather than policy changes led to rent rises in some cities, highlighting the complex interplay of factors influencing housing markets.
Investor Behavior and Property Industry Myths
Investor behavior and myths propagated by the property industry play significant roles in the negative gearing debate.
-
Investor Behavior: Some investors may sell their properties if tax concessions are less generous, reducing house prices but not increasing rents. The sale of an investment property means one less rental property and one less renter, maintaining the balance.
-
Property Industry Myths: The property industry often uses myths to justify the continuation of negative gearing and CGT concessions, such as claims that restricting these concessions would hurt middle-income earners and reduce new housing supply.
Labor Party's Proposal and Political Risk
The Labor Party's proposal to limit negative gearing to new builds only aims to address concerns about housing affordability, but it carries political risks.
-
Labor Party's Proposal: The Labor Party's proposal to limit negative gearing to new builds only aims to reduce the impact on the housing market and make housing more accessible for first-home buyers.
-
Political Risk: Restricting negative gearing carries political risk, particularly in affluent areas where property investors are concentrated, potentially leading to political resistance.
Economic Impact and Tax Concessions Cost
The economic impact of negative gearing is complex, with significant costs to the budget and effects on the housing market.
-
Economic Impact: Negative gearing reduces the tax burden for investors but also distorts the housing market by encouraging more investors to compete with would-be homebuyers, leading to higher house prices and rents.
-
Tax Concessions Cost: The concessions provided by negative gearing and CGT cost the budget billions of dollars annually, a significant consideration in any policy debate.
-
Affluent Areas Affected: Proposed changes to negative gearing would primarily affect affluent areas with high concentrations of property investors, who are more likely to be adversely affected by restrictions.
Long-term Perspective and Capital Gains Tax
Investors using negative gearing must adopt a long-term perspective, and the CGT discount is a critical component of the strategy.
-
Long-term Perspective: Investors using negative gearing must adopt a long-term perspective, expecting the property to appreciate significantly in value over time.
-
Capital Gains Tax: The CGT discount is a critical component of the negative gearing strategy, allowing investors to pay only 50% of the capital gain, significantly reducing tax liability.
Investment Strategy Risks and High-Income Earners Advantages
Negative gearing carries risks, particularly for new properties, and high-income earners have advantages in this strategy.
-
Investment Strategy Risks: Risks include the potential for property values to decline, leading to significant losses. Investors must carefully consider these risks.
-
Existing vs. New Properties Risks: Investing in brand-new properties carries higher risks compared to existing properties, as new properties are more likely to depreciate in value.
-
High-Income Earners Advantages: High-income earners can afford to buy better-quality properties and pay for expert advice, increasing their chances of making capital gains.
Taxable Income Distribution Risks and Myths
The distribution of taxable income among those who negatively gear is skewed, and myths about negative gearing's benefits persist.
-
Taxable Income Distribution Risks: The distribution of taxable income among those who negatively gear is skewed, with the majority of tax benefits flowing to the top 10% of income earners.
-
Myth: Negative Gearing Promotes New Housing Supply Risks: The property industry's claim that negative gearing promotes new housing supply is disputed, as over 93% of property lending is for existing housing.
-
Myth: Negative Gearing Keeps Rent Prices Lower Risks: The property industry's claim that rents rise when negative gearing is restricted is not supported by historical data, with rent increases largely due to population growth and insufficient residential construction.
Impact on First-Home Buyers Opportunities and Government Revenue
Changes to negative gearing could make housing more accessible for first-home buyers and have significant implications for government revenue.
-
Impact on First-Home Buyers Opportunities: Changes to negative gearing could make housing more accessible for first-home buyers by reducing the number of rental properties available, potentially lowering barriers to entry.
-
Government Revenue Opportunities: The cost to the public purse from negative gearing is substantial, with significant savings for future governments.
Final Thoughts on Negative Gearing
Negative gearing is a hot topic in Australia, especially among property investors. It allows investors to deduct losses from their taxable income, reducing their tax burden. This strategy, combined with the capital gains tax discount, can lead to significant savings. However, it also has its downsides. Critics argue it drives up house prices and rents, making it harder for first-home buyers to enter the market. Most benefits go to high-income earners, adding to the debate. While some propose limiting negative gearing to new builds, others worry about the impact on the rental market. Understanding the intricacies of negative gearing is crucial for both investors and policymakers. It’s a complex issue with far-reaching consequences, affecting everything from individual tax bills to the broader housing market. Whether you’re for or against it, negative gearing remains a significant part of Australia’s financial landscape.
Frequently Asked Questions
Was this page helpful?
Our commitment to delivering trustworthy and engaging content is at the heart of what we do. Each fact on our site is contributed by real users like you, bringing a wealth of diverse insights and information. To ensure the highest standards of accuracy and reliability, our dedicated editors meticulously review each submission. This process guarantees that the facts we share are not only fascinating but also credible. Trust in our commitment to quality and authenticity as you explore and learn with us.